site stats

Tofan singh judgment

Webb9 juli 2024 · The trial court, looking at all the facts gave its judgment on 18 th December 2009 stating that the contraband was apprehended by the officers in the middle of the … Webb29 dec. 2024 · In 2004, Tofan Singh, along with five individuals, was arrested for smuggling 5kgs of heroin out of India. The Special Court under the NDPS Act convicted them to ten …

"Tofan Singh

Webb12 nov. 2024 · R.F. Nariman, J. 1. These Appeals and Special Leave Petitions arise by virtue of a reference order of a Division Bench of this Court reported as Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2013) 16 SCC 31. The facts in that appeal have been set out in that judgment in some detail, and need not be repeated by us. Webb22 juli 2024 · The judgment of the Supreme Court in Tofan Singh vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2024) 4 SCC 1 was also noticed. Assailing this judgment, the State of Haryana … hobart architects uk https://max-cars.net

NDPS Act : Are

Webb29 okt. 2024 · Click Here To Download Judgment [Read Judgment] Tags Section 67 NDPS Act NDPS Act Supreme Court Justice RF Nariman Justice Indira Banerjee Justice Navin … Webb30 okt. 2024 · The Supreme Court has held by a 2:1 majority that officers under Section 53 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985 are police officers … hrms drlalpathlabs

Satnam Singh vs State Of Punjab on 20 December, 2024

Category:[Breaking] Officers Authorised To Investigate NDPS Cases Are …

Tags:Tofan singh judgment

Tofan singh judgment

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE …

Webb29 okt. 2024 · In Kartar Singh (supra), the majority judgment referred to Article 20(3) in the following terms: “205. In our Constitution as well as procedural law and law of Evidence, … Webb24 okt. 2024 · The import of the judgement in Tofan Singh v State of Tamil Nadu is that statements made under S.67 of the NDPS Act is not admissible as evidence as it is hit by …

Tofan singh judgment

Did you know?

WebbSection 67 of the NDPS Act, in light of the judgment of this Court in Tofan Singh Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, (2024) 4 SCC 1. It is. pointed out that the charges under Sections 9-A and 25 of the NDPS Act have been framed and to this extent there is no challenge and dispute. Webb10 aug. 2024 · I'll return to Section 53-A when discussing the issue of whether or not Section 67 can be the source of recording confessions, which is the second issue posed in the Tofan Singh reference (Curiously, the 2013 judgment does not mention Section 53-A …

Webb5 nov. 2024 · A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India, by a majority of 2:1, while answering a reference in the case of Tofan Singh Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, on 29 October … WebbTofan Singh's case (supra) cannot be granted to an accused while considering pre-arrest bail. In view of the aforesaid settled law, no ground to grant pre- arrest bail to the petitioner is made out. Consequently, the same is ordered to be dismissed. Needless to say nothing recorded hereinabove should be

Webbthe judgment and award passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Dehradun was required to be transferred to the High Court of Uttarakhand by the Chief Justice of the … Webb8 okt. 2013 · “ Mr. B.B. Singh also brought to our notice a judgment of this Court in the case of Raj Kumar Karwal v. Union of India in support of the contention that even a …

Webb5 dec. 2024 · It is remarkable, refreshing, rejuvenating and most relaxing to see that just recently on October 29, 2024, a three Judge Bench of the Apex Court comprising of …

Webb31 jan. 2024 · With an ongoing crackdown under the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act), the Tofan Singh judgment assumes great significance. The case revolved around conflicts arising from three laws, namely, the NDPS Act, The Evidence Act, 1872 and the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). hrms eagle bizWebbthe judgment and award passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Dehradun was required to be transferred to the High Court of Uttarakhand by the Chief Justice of the High Court of Allahabad in exercise of power under SubSection (2) of Section 35 of the ‘Act’. Section 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Reorganization Act reads as under: "35. hrm search partners irelandWebb19 apr. 2024 · Landmark Criminal law judgement No. 12 - Toofan Singh vs State of Tamil Nadu. The judgement in this case was delivered by three-judge bench consisting of justices Rohinton Fali Nariman, Navin Sinha, and Indira Banerjee. The court delivered the judgement by 2:1 majority where justice Indira Banerjee descended from the opinion of the majority. hrms eclinicalworks loginWebb4 jan. 2024 · tofan singh v. state of tamil nadu In this landmark judgment, the Supreme Court had held that interpreted the term “officers” as used in section 53 of the NDPS … hrms ecomakWebbthe judgement in its para 316 held that in the absence of a provision similar to the Fourth. fAmendment to the US Constitution, the right to privacy cannot be read into the … hrms drenthe facebookWebb17 aug. 2024 · The Arguments Before the Division Bench in Tofan Singh The 2013 judgment acknowledges that the two questions are interlinked, but even so, it referred the second question because there were … hrmsefl peoplestrongWebb22 nov. 2024 · Courts Observation and Judgment . The bench noted, "The High Court was not correct in relying on the statements made by other accused under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, in light of the judgment of this Court in Tofan Singh Vs.State of Tamil Nadu, (2024) 4 SCC 1". The Supreme Court observed that the factual position was that no … hobart archery club